The accolade of “Player of the Match” holds significant weight, showcasing an individual’s outstanding performance that sways the game’s dynamics. Recently, former cricketer Gautam Gambhir ignited a heated debate by expressing his views on the selection process of the Player of the Match. Gambhir boldly stated, “Commentators shouldn’t be deciding the Player of the match; I am also a commentator, and they can be biased. It should be stopped.” He further proposed a unique alternative, suggesting that the responsibility should lie with the losing team’s coach or captain.
Before delving into Gambhir’s perspective, let’s first understand the traditional norms governing the selection of the Player of the Match. Historically, this decision has been entrusted to a panel of experts, often comprising former cricketers and renowned commentators. These individuals observe the match closely, analysing the players’ performances based on various parameters such as runs scored, wickets taken, fielding prowess, and overall impact on the game.
Gautam Gambhir wants a change in the man Of The Match system
While the existing system has its merits, critics argue that it may not always be impartial. Commentators, being humans, can inadvertently display biases towards certain players or teams, influencing their judgement. Gambhir’s vocal stance on this matter has reignited discussions on whether a more objective approach is needed in determining the Player of the Match.
Gambhir’s suggestion of involving the losing team’s coach or captain in selecting the Player of the Match introduces a unique twist to the conventional process. The idea behind this proposal is to eliminate potential biases associated with commentators and ensure a fair evaluation of players’ performances, irrespective of the match outcome.
According to Gambhir, coaches and captains of the losing team are likely to have a more objective perspective. This, in theory, could lead to a more impartial and accurate selection of the Player of the Match. To truly understand the nuances of this debate, it’s essential to explore the historical evolution of the Man of the Match concept. Initially introduced in the 1970s, the award aimed to recognize and celebrate outstanding individual contributions to the game. Over the years, the criteria for selection have evolved, adapting to the changing dynamics of cricket.
Gambhir said "Commentators shouldn't be deciding the Player of the match, I am also a commentator and they can be biased, it should be stopped – so it should be losing team's coach or captain should be selecting the Player of the match award". [Sportskeeda] pic.twitter.com/i5cC90kN43
— Johns. (@CricCrazyJohns) December 27, 2023
